Last edited by Malasida
Friday, July 17, 2020 | History

4 edition of Stimulus-response compatibility found in the catalog.

Stimulus-response compatibility

data, theory, and application

by Robert W. Proctor

  • 9 Want to read
  • 33 Currently reading

Published by Taylor&Francis in Boca Raton, Fla .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Conditioned response.,
  • Stimulus generalization.,
  • Human-machine systems.

  • Edition Notes

    Includes bibliographical references and index.

    StatementRobert W. Proctor, Kim-Phuong L. Vu.
    ContributionsVu, Kim-Phuong L.
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsBF319 .P76 2006
    The Physical Object
    Paginationp. cm.
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL3431281M
    ISBN 100415315360
    LC Control Number2005056884

    Buy (ebook) Stimulus-Response Compatibility by R.W. Proctor, T.G. Reeve, eBook format, from the Dymocks online bookstore. Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), –

    It all began in the mids. Although the term stimulus-response compatibility had been coined and already introduced by Small in (see Small, ), the real spark for compatibility research were the now classic papers by Fitts and Seeger () and Fitts and Deininger (). Stimulus-response compatibility refers to the finding that certain mappings of stimuli to responses produce faster and more accurate responding than do others. The present volume surveys compatibility research which falls into four broad categorie.

      Fitts found that participants were faster in the first condition, which presented a stimulus–response compatibility. Definition: Stimulus–response compatibility is the degree to which the physical arrangement of the stimuli matches the location of the expected responses. Stimulus–response compatibility is highly relevant for design. S-R compatibility refers to the finding that responses are faster and more accurate when the stimuli and responses correspond than when they do not. TVP refers to the finding that reaction times (RTs) are longer when the target stimulus on the current trial (probe) has served as the distractor on the previous trial (prime) as compared with.


Share this book
You might also like
Curriculum as conversation

Curriculum as conversation

Browning and the modern tradition

Browning and the modern tradition

Labour economics

Labour economics

manual of the Mollusca

manual of the Mollusca

English-Tagalog, Tagalog-English dictionary

English-Tagalog, Tagalog-English dictionary

Epoxy Resins and Composites I (Advances in Polymer Science)

Epoxy Resins and Composites I (Advances in Polymer Science)

Characterization of OCTN1 and OCTN2 in the human mammary gland

Characterization of OCTN1 and OCTN2 in the human mammary gland

Need for congressional approval of governing international fishery agreements

Need for congressional approval of governing international fishery agreements

Lunar electric power systems utilizing the SP-100 reactor coupled to dynamic conversion systems (task order no. 12)

Lunar electric power systems utilizing the SP-100 reactor coupled to dynamic conversion systems (task order no. 12)

Herbert Spencer betrayed

Herbert Spencer betrayed

Stalin and the Lubianka

Stalin and the Lubianka

Amendments to the alien labor rules and regulations

Amendments to the alien labor rules and regulations

Income maintenance for the unemployed in Britain and the response to high unemployment

Income maintenance for the unemployed in Britain and the response to high unemployment

Legends from Indian history

Legends from Indian history

API report, Merlung, WPP XII SKP A, D, E, F & H

API report, Merlung, WPP XII SKP A, D, E, F & H

strange inventor

strange inventor

Memphis Riots and Massacres

Memphis Riots and Massacres

The Impact of the Great Recession on Social Security and Welfare in Latin America and the Caribbean

The Impact of the Great Recession on Social Security and Welfare in Latin America and the Caribbean

Stimulus-response compatibility by Robert W. Proctor Download PDF EPUB FB2

Summarizing the state of contemporary knowledge regarding determinants of compatibility, Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application provides thorough, up-to-date coverage of basic and applied research coupled with an emphasis on relating this knowledge to specific design by: Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application: Data Theory and Applications - Kindle edition by Proctor, Robert W., Vu, Kim-Phuong L.

Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or cturer: CRC Press. Stimulus-response compatibility refers to the finding that certain mappings of stimuli to responses produce faster and more accurate responding than do others. The present volume surveys compatibility research which falls into four broad categories: (a) mental representation and coding (b) neurophysiological mechanisms (c) motor performance (d) human factors applications.

Stimulus-response compatibility refers to the finding that certain mappings of stimuli to responses produce faster and more accurate responding than do others. The present volume surveys compatibility Book Edition: 1.

Understanding of the factors that influence stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility and determine when and how compatibility effects will arise is a necessary foundation for appropriately applying compatibility principles in design and for evaluating the relative compatibility of alternative designs.

Summarizing the state of contemporary knowledge reCited by: Stimulus–Response Compatibility and Selection of Action: Basic Concepts Atkins () emphasizes that great ideas in science are simple concepts with far-reaching consequences. Within the study of human performance and, more generally, psychology, the concept of stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility introduced by Paul Fitts and colleagues a little over 50 years ago qualifies as a great : Robert W.

Proctor, Kim-Phuong L. Spatial Coding and Spatio-Anatomical Mapping: Evidence for a Hierarchical Model of Spatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility Gabriele Heister, Peter Schroeder-Heister, Walter. Purchase Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility, Volume - 1st Edition. Print Book & E-Book.

ISBNStimulus-Response Compatibility Stimulus-Response (S-R) Compatibility is usually defined as the ‘naturalness of the connection between the stimulus and the associated response'. Reaction Time for skill performance is faster the more compatible the S-R pairs.

Stimulus-Response Compatibility (SRC) is an easy to observe phenomenon. It occurs when there is a harmonious relation between what you observe and how you have to respond to it.

The figure below shows a daily life example of a compatible and incompatible situation. In this chapter, we do exactly this, through the analysis and modeling of performance in a set of related stimulus-response compatibility tasks.

This excursion into compatibility phenomena is a digression from the primary focus on practice, but it is a necessary step in the development of the chunking by: Understanding of the factors that influence stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility and determine when and how compatibility effects will arise is a necessary foundation for appropriately applying 5/5(1).

Another determinant of S-R compatibility is the destination of a moving stimulus. For example, an object moving towards the right hand is more compatible with a right-hand response than an object moving towards the left hand, even if the object is closer to the left hand when the stimulus is perceived.

Stimulus-response compatibility refers to the finding that certain mappings of stimuli to responses produce faster and more accurate responding than do others. The present volume surveys compatibility research which falls into four broad categories: (a) mental representation and coding (b) neurophysiological mechanisms (c) motor performance (d.

Stimulus-response compatibility refers to the finding that certain mappings of stimuli to responses produce faster and more accurate responding than do others. The present volume surveys. The purpose of this paper was to provide insight into the nature of response selection by reviewing the literature on stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effects and the psychological refractory period (PRP) effect individually and jointly.

The empirical findings and theoretical explanations of SRC effects that have been studied within a single-task context suggest that there are two. select article Commentary on Eimer: Stimulus-response compatibility and the lateralized readiness potential.

Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application: Data Theory and Applications eBook: Proctor, Robert W., Vu, Kim-Phuong L.: Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility. Things That Go Together: A Review of Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Related Effects (E.A.

Alluisi, J.S. Warm). The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional Cue on Human Information Processing (J.R. Simon). Mental Representation. Spatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility (C. Umilta, R. Nicoletti). Stimulus-response compatibility and affective computing: A review Article (PDF Available) in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 8(6) November with Reads How we measure.

Psychology Definition of STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY: Actually, it is the limit to which the link of stimulus and response can facilitate the evoking .The chunking of goal hierarchies: a model of practice and stimulus-response compatibility.Stimulus-response compatibility in the programming of speech Article (PDF Available) in Memory & Cognition 15(3) May with 33 Reads How we measure 'reads'.